The Canadian Parliamentary System

Canada’s form of government is based on the British parliamentary system, also known as the Westminster System, a style of democracy adapted from centuries of English tradition. Canada’s founders believed the British had the best form of government in the world, and the opening lines of the Canadian constitution promises Canada will have a “Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom.”

The Parliament of Canada

Housed in an enormous neo-Gothic building in the capital city of Ottawa, Canada’s national parliament is a bicameral legislature, meaning it’s split into two chambers: the House of Commons and the Senate.

The House of Commons consists of 338 elected politicians (known as MPs), while the Senate consists of 105 important people (known as senators) appointed by the prime minister. The Senate is fairly ceremonial and inconsequential (more on this later), so when most Canadians refer to “Parliament” they are usually referring to just the House.

The Canadian parliament serves two basic purposes: choosing the Canadian government and creating new laws.

The House of Commons

338 members (MPs) all elected at the same time, every four years, in a Canadian federal election. No term limits, members can be re-elected indefinitely. Members represent 338 different geographic districts, or ridings, across the country, with larger provinces electing more members than smaller ones.

The Senate

105 senators appointed by the prime minister of Canada whenever vacancies occur. Senators serve until retirement or their 75th birthday and cannot be fired. Senate seats are not distributed among the provinces according to any consistent logic.

Choosing the Government

After the results of a parliamentary election come in, the Governor General of Canada ceremonially appoints the leader of the political party that has elected the most members to the House of Commons as prime minister, and the prime minister forms a government. In practice, “forming a government” means picking a cabinet, which the prime minister does by appointing other high-profile MPs from his party caucus to key positions in the executive branch (foreign minister, attorney general, etc.). He will also choose various senior staffers and advisers to run the federal bureaucracy.

The second-largest political party in the House of Commons is appointed as the Official Opposition, or, if we want to use the grandiose, formal name, Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition. The leader of the second-largest party is given the title of Leader of the Opposition and appoints a shadow cabinet of politicians from her party to offer targeted criticism to the government of the day. This is discussed in more detail in the House of Commons chapter.

Majority or Minority?

Depending on how the results of an election go, Canada can either have a majority or minority government. A majority government is one where the largest party controls a mathematical majority of seats in the House of Commons, which is what happens most of the time. Canada’s current government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (b. 1971) is a majority government, since his party, the Liberal Party of Canada, controls 54 per cent of the seats in the House of Commons.

Sometimes, however, if there is a strong third party presence in the House, no one party will hold an outright majority and the division of seats will be more even. In such cases, the party with the largest number of seats, or plurality, forms the government. This is known as a minority government, since Government MPs will be mathematically outnumbered by the combined total of opposition MPs.

It’s theoretically possible that in the context of a minority government, two smaller parties could join forces to form a combined majority in the House, which would then allow them to form the government together. This is known as a multi-party coalition government and it’s very common in Europe, where parliaments tend to be evenly divided among many small parties. In Canada, however, the coalition government idea is quite controversial, and has never been successfully attempted. Canada has a strong tradition of letting the plurality rule even if that plurality is very narrow. It’s not entirely clear who would be the prime minister or how the cabinet would be appointed in a coalition government. British tradition says the governor general of Canada would have to mediate the process, but this is a controversial idea as well, since the governor general is not elected.

Non Confidence Voting

The Canadian parliamentary system is said to honour the idea of responsible government as one of its key principles. This means that the government is responsible to the people, but also that the politicians who run the government are responsible to the entire House of Commons — even the opposition parties. If the House of Commons votes that it has “lost confidence” in the government, then that government is said to have lost its democratic right to remain in office.

At any time, any member of the House of Commons can introduce a proposal known as a confidence motion that declares something to the effect of: “be it resolved this House no longer has confidence in the present Government of Canada.” If that motion passes, the House is said to have voted no confidence in the government, and the government must call an emergency parliamentary election, and win it, in order to remain in office.

Successful no confidence votes only occur in the context of a minority government (see above), since passing a no confidence vote, like any other vote, requires the approval of a majority of MPs to pass. There does not have to be a significant scandal or controversy to justify launching a no confidence vote against a sitting government; it’s largely a strategic decision made by opposition parties to force an election at a time when they believe their chances of getting elected are highest. Indeed, whenever a minority government is elected, it essentially becomes a question of “when, not if” the opposition parties will choose to vote the government down. Most minority governments don’t last longer than two years.

Passing Canadian Laws

New Canadian laws are generally dreamed up by the prime minister and his cabinet. A draft law is known as a bill, and after it’s written, a relevant cabinet minister will introduce the bill to the House of Commons. After an initial vote to consider, a relevant House committee will debate the details of the proposed bill and possibly make some changes, then send it back to the House for further votes of approval. After the House votes to approve, the bill goes to the Senate, where it is usually quickly approved. It then goes to the governor general, who ceremonially signs it into law (known as giving royal assent).

Generally speaking, the parliamentary process of lawmaking is not very closely followed by the Canadian media or Canadians themselves. Any bill a prime minister wants to see passed almost always does, mostly due to Canada’s strong party discipline (see sidebar). It is the prime minister’s proposal of a new law that usually triggers the most intense period of debate, and when a government announces an unpopular bill, the most important opposition to it will generally come from the public or media, rather than from MPs in parliament.

The Role of the Senate

You may notice we have barely discussed the Canadian Senate in many of the above scenarios. This is because the Senate is a fairly inconsequential body in day-to-day Canadian government. It plays no role in the forming of governments or confidence votes, and instead functions as a mostly ceremonial body whose main purpose is quietly approving legislation from the House of Commons so it can become law. The Senate can theoretically veto, or reject, legislation from the House it does not like, but this very rarely happens, even when the Senate and the House are controlled by different political parties (which itself rarely happens for long). Because the Senate is not elected, it is seen as distasteful for it to get too involved in the lawmaking process.

The weakness (and some would say pointlessness) of the Senate has caused many Canadians to call for the Senate to be abolished, as is discussed in more detail in the Senate chapter.